|

A visitor to Salon 94 Freemans looks at Aïda Ruilova's video piece,
"Lulu."

Just east and south of the New Museum of Contemporary Art's Bowery site,
some two dozen galleries, many of them recent arrivals, are open for
business. This is an upbeat moment for a part of town that has seen its
share of hard times.

“The Oracle,” a painting, at rear, by Ylva Ogland at Fruit and Flower
Deli, is said to embody a goddess-muse named Snofrid.

"Disasters of Modernism" by Peter Gallo, at Sunday.

Opening night of the artist Do Ho Suh's installation titled
"Reflection" at Lehmann Maupin Gallery.

A view of Lizzi Bougatsos's show, "Street Feather"at the James
Fuentes gallery. At left, "Birdhouse for Humans," at center,
"Splatfly," and 'Googles #1."
The inaugural festivities of the new New Museum of
Contemporary Art kick off today at noon and continue for a celebratory 30
admission-free hours. Just east and south of the museum’s Bowery site,
some two dozen galleries, many of them recent arrivals, are open for
business.
This is an upbeat moment for a part of town that has seen
its share of hard times, and lots of people are cheering. But at least a
few have a more skeptical take: Here comes the art, there goes the
neighborhood.
Actually, this has been the situation since the East Village art boom of
the 1980s, the last time Manhattan had anything like an alternative art
universe, a neighborhood where artists and dealers — themselves often
artists — lived, worked, showed, shopped and danced at night. But once
art made the neighborhood chic, limousines were idling outside the
storefront galleries. Real estate soared. Artists moved.
The Lower East Side just south of the East Village — roughly between
Houston and Canal Streets east of Bowery — remained a bargain for a
while and kept its Latino-Chinese-punk cultural mix. Galleries came and
went; a few exhibition spaces — ABC No Rio, Gallery 128, the Asian
American Arts Center, the Henry Street Settlement, the Educational
Alliance — are still there. But this was never a gallery-intensive
scene.
Things are changing fast. In the last few years several new galleries have
put down roots. Canada, Cucchifritos, FusionArts, Participant Inc., Reena
Spaulings and Rivington Arms led the way, later joined by Miguel Abreu
Gallery and the artist-run Orchard; more recently James Fuentes, Fruit and
Flower Deli, Smith-Stewart, Sunday, Eleven Rivington and Thierry Goldberg
have opened.
In addition, there are some transplants: Janos Gat and Luxe have moved
down from the Upper East Side, 31 Grand from Williamsburg and Envoy from
Chelsea, with Feature coming in January. And satellite spaces are popping
up: Lehman Maupin (Chelsea), Greenberg Van Doren (57th Street), Salon 94
(Upper East Side) and Museum 52 (London) have all opened Lower East Side
extensions.
Of the new crop, the start-ups are by far the most interesting. James
Fuentes LLC is slightly below Canal Street in Chinatown, in a part of town
remote enough to have kept traces of the past. One of the oldest Jewish
cemeteries in the United States is here, as is the Roman Catholic church
for which the street, St. James Place, was named. The young Mr. Fuentes,
who operates out of a wedge-shaped storefront, grew up in the area, and
the art he favors smacks of the street, and of the post-punk music scene
identified with the Lower East Side.
The artist on view now, Lizzi Bougatsos, is a member of the band Gang Gang
Dance. The tentlike sculpture in her solo show was inspired by an
encounter with a homeless person who made birdhouses. Her piece, assembled
from found bits of cloth and cardboard, was conceived as a human-size
version. Mr. Fuentes has ambitious plans for projects that will extend
into the Lower East Side and relate to its history and character. For
starters he has produced an excellent art map of the area, available at
his gallery, with both existing and vanished galleries noted, perfect for
an in-depth tour.
The scavenging punk spirit of Ms. Bougatsos’s work is shared, with
certain refinements, by the artist Peter Gallo, who lives in rural Vermont
and has an excellent show at Sunday. A collagist and draftsman of
considerable invention, Mr. Gallo is also an art critic and historian, a
psychiatric social worker and a wide-ranging reader and music lover, all
of which comes through in intensely referential work that embraces Freud,
Roland Barthes, Dusty Springfield, gay pornography and ornithology.
Mr. Gallo’s art has an insider-outsider look that can, in other hands,
turn precious and generic, but he makes it work. I lingered over each
piece, and if I had to choose a favorite artist from my tour, he would
certainly be on the shortlist.
If I had to name a favorite gallery, the choice is clear: Fruit and Flower
Deli, which feels like a work of art in itself thanks to its carefully
stage-managed image. The gallery’s press material says it is an
emanation of a goddess-muse named Snofrid, otherwise known as the Oracle,
who is embodied in a painting of a mirror by Ylva Ogland, a Swedish artist
represented by the Smith-Stewart gallery next door.
The concept is clearly borrowed from another local
gallery, Reena Spaulings, named for a fictitious artist-dealer-writer, but
with a kind of New Age aura added. Fruit and Flower’s director, Rodrigo
Mallea Lira, who is married to Ms. Ogland, refers to himself as the
Keeper, appointed by Snofrid, whom he speaks of with studied reverence.
When I was there, traces remained of a recent performance, though they may
be gone by now. (A Belgian collector snapped them up.)
In any case, a new show, “Son of Man,” opens today.
It’s by the European collective called Friends International, which has
agreed to pay the gallery’s rent for a year as part of an art project.
As for what the opening holds, I can only tell you what the Oracle told me
via the Keeper (via e-mail): At 3 p.m. there will be a sermon delivered,
in which “someone will eventually say something,” in consequence of
which “love will extend over time, building bridges.”
One of the great attractions of Fruit and Flower Deli is that it doesn’t
feel as if it had been shipped in preassembled from elsewhere, which is
the impression given by other recent arrivals.
Museum 52, for example, has not taken advantage of its move to the Lower
East Side to experiment with the standard white-cube gallery format. But
at least its inaugural group show, fittingly enough on the theme of
display, has a stimulating mix of artists.
Sarah Greenberger Rafferty approaches the theme literally, with
elaborately mounted photographs of souvenir plates. George Henry Longly
renders it subliminal in paintings that fade into the wall. A sculpture of
broken mirrors by Philip Hausmeier thwarts attempts at self-regard, while
the talented young New York artist Sean Raspet turns transparent hair gel
into an exhibition medium.
Lehman Maupin’s new space is an ideal place to see a beautiful
installation by Do-Ho Suh: a sculpture, made from translucent fabric, of
an arched gate he remembers from his parents’ house in Korea. Colored
the blue-green of celadon porcelain, the sculpture is self-reflective,
standing upright on a sheet of clear fabric suspended halfway up the
gallery wall, with an identical image hanging upside down below. Because
the new gallery space has a balcony, the piece can easily be seen from
either vantage point. (Mr. Suh also has work at the gallery’s home base
in Chelsea.)
Aïda Ruilova’s short video, “Lulu,” at Salon 94 Freemans turns the
story of Wedekind’s theatrical femme fatale into a short, all-male
psychodrama that feels like the resolution of a longer film we don’t
see. Ms. Ruilova’s Gothic sensibility feels at home in a part of town
once known as the last Manhattan frontier of a cultural underground. But
I’ll miss the gallery this one replaces, Silo, which regularly offered
an alternative to market-approved fare.
So does Janos Gat. Mr. Gat has long specialized in presenting European
artists of an older generation little or never seen in New York, and he
has made an excellent choice in this survey of paintings by Judit Reigl.
Born in Budapest in 1923, she fled Hungary in 1950 for Paris. There her
fantastic figurative work caught the eye of André Breton. But Surrealism
per se held little interest for her, and she moved on to do a remarkable
series of abstract paintings, changing her style to avoid settling into a
routine.
The examples here run through the 1970s; rich in themselves, they document
a career that fruitfully took alternative paths every step of the way.
Maybe “alternative” is just a sentimental notion. It has long been
useful for selling art, but with the market so flush, nobody even needs it
anymore. Yet some people still want it, and live it, and have a kind of
faith in it: the “it” that can’t be mass-produced, can’t be
packaged for museums, can’t even be made to make sense. Fruit and
Flower’s zaniness is somewhere in this area. Mr. Fuentes has an instinct
for far-outness that I hope he will cultivate.
Participant Inc. seems to be built on underground-culture foundations,
which has always made its life a little chancy. Earlier this year this
nonprofit gallery lost its space to rent increases. (Museum 52 is in there
now.) Its new home in a former sex club turned coin laundry is raw, to say
the least: dirt floor, battered brick walls, no heat. The place will be
spiffed up for an official January opening. Meanwhile it’s a perfect
setting for performances of a dark-toned play, “Erase,” by Tom Cole
and the artist team Lovett/Codagnone (John Lovett and Alessandro
Codagnone), which has performances tonight and tomorrow.
Participant’s founder and director, Lia Gangitano, is a longtime Lower
East Side habitué. She’s a connoisseur of shoestring operations. She
knows the neighborhood’s hidden histories. So far she has kept afloat in
a rising tide of gentrification that will almost certainly never recede.
It’s great for the art world that the New Museum has come to the Lower
East Side — so much space! — and that Chelsea is staking colonial
claims. But it’s even greater for art in the world, including New York
City, that Ms. Gangitano has stayed.
December 9, 2007 |