|
Well, It Looks Like Truth

"Overture, 1986" by Stan Douglas
"After an autumn of large, expert, risk-free museum
retrospectives," writes Holland Cotter, "the time is
right for a brain-pincher of a theme show, which is what 'Archive
Fever: Uses of the Document in Contemporary Art' at the
International Center of Photography is."

"Untitled (Death by Gun), 1990" by Felix Gonzalez-Torres
"Organized by Okwui Enwezor, an adjunct curator at the
center," Hollad Cotter continues, "it’s an exhibition
in a style that’s out of fashion in our pro-luxe, anti-academic
time, but that can still produce gems."

"Machinen 3440, 2003" by Thomas Ruff
"The archive of the title is less a thing than a concept, an
immersive environment: the sum total of documentary images
circulating in the culture, on the street, in the media, and
finally in what is called the collective memory, the ‘Where were
you when you heard about the World Trade Center?’ factor.

"Jackie, 2007" by Lorna Simpson
"Photography, with its extensions in film, video and the
digital realm, is the main vehicle for these images. The time was,
we thought of photographs as recorders of reality. Now we know
they largely invent reality. At one stage or another, whether in
shooting, developing, editing or placement, the pictures are
manipulated, which means that we are manipulated. We are so used
to this that we don’t see it; it’s just as a fact of
life."

"Reserve-Detective III," 1987 by Christian Boltanski
"Art, which is in the business of questioning facts, takes
manipulation as a subject of investigation. And certain
contemporary photographers do so by diving deep into the archive
to explore its mechanics and to carve their own clarifying
archives from it. ‘Archive Fever’ puts us deep inside right
from the start. The gallery walls have been covered with sheets of
plain industrial plywood. The exhibition space looks like the
interior of a storage shed or a shipping container packed with
images both strange and familiar."

"Familiar comes first: Andy Warhol’s early 1960s ‘Race
Riot,’ a silk-screened image of a black civil rights marcher
attacked by police dogs. Warhol, our pop Proust, was a child of
the archive; he lived in it and never left it. He culled his
images straight from the public record — in this case Life
magazine — and then made them public in a new way, as a new kind
of art, the tabloid masterpiece, the cheesy sublime."

"The Fae Richards Photo Archive, 1993-1996" by Zoe
Leonard
"There are many tales in ‘Archive Fever.’ In most, fact
and fiction are confused. A group of pictures called ‘The Fae
Richards Photo Archive’ (1993-1996), produced by Zoe Leonard in
collaboration with the filmmaker Cheryl Dunye, purports to
document the life of an African-American actress from her
childhood early in the 20th century through her post-civil rights
era old age. The substance of the narrative, including a film
career sabotaged by racism, rings true; but Fae Richards never
existed. Her life was staged for the contemporary camera."

"Floh: Baby Lotion, 2000" by Tacita Dean
"Other artists present randomness as the archive’s logic.
The casual snapshots that make up Tacita Dean’s salon-style
‘Floh’ may look like a natural grouping. In fact they are all
found pictures that the artist, acting as a curator, has sorted
into a semblance of order."

"Floh: Bathers in Sea, 2000" by Tacita Dean

"Haji Qiamuddin holding a photograph of his brother,
Asamuddin, 1997" from the series "The Victor Weeps:
Afghanistan" by Fazal Sheikh
"Each of the four pictures in Fazal Sheikh’s ‘Victor
Weeps: Afghanistan’ series (1997) is of a hand holding a
passport-size photographic male portrait. Statements by the family
members who hold the photos tell us that they are portraits of
Afghan mujahedeen fighters who had died or disappeared during
battles with occupying Russian forces in the 1980s."

"Abdul Aziz holding a photograph of his brother, Mula Abdul
Hakim, 1997" from the series "The Victor Weeps:
Afghanistan" by Fazal Sheikh
"Although the portraits are in each case held loosely, even
tenderly, the words they evoke are passionate. These little
pictures — routine, unexceptional, of a kind turned out in
countless numbers — may be the only visual link between the dead
and their survivors. Here the archival is profoundly personal. But
do Mr. Sheikh’s beautiful pictures, or the photographs within
them, represent some special, easily approached corner of the
great archive that surrounds, shapes and even overwhelms us? Do
they convey , for once, some comprehendible truth? No, just the
ordinary one: When it comes to full disclosure, art never, ever
speaks for itself, as Mr. Enwezor’s eloquent exhibition tells us
in many ways."
After an autumn of
large, expert, risk-free museum retrospectives, the time is right
for a brain-pincher of a theme show, which is what “Archive
Fever: Uses of the Document in Contemporary Art” at the
International Center of Photography is.
Organized by Okwui Enwezor, an adjunct curator at the center,
it’s an exhibition in a style that’s out of fashion in our pro-luxe,
anti-academic time, but that can still produce gems. The tough, somber
little show “Manet and the Execution of Maximilian” at the Museum
of Modern Art last year mixed grand paintings with throwaway prints
and demanded a commitment of time and attention from its audience. The
payoff was an exhibition that read like breaking news and had the pull
of a good documentary. It was the museum’s proudest offering of the
season.
Mr. Enwezor’s “Archive Fever” is up there with it. It has
something like the same suspenseful pace, without the focused story
line. The archive of the title is less a thing than a concept, an
immersive environment: the sum total of documentary images circulating
in the culture, on the street, in the media, and finally in what is
called the collective memory, the “Where were you when you heard
about the World Trade Center?” factor.
Photography, with its extensions in film, video and the digital
realm, is the main vehicle for these images. The time was, we thought
of photographs as recorders of reality. Now we know they largely
invent reality. At one stage or another, whether in shooting,
developing, editing or placement, the pictures are manipulated, which
means that we are manipulated. We are so used to this that we don’t
see it; it’s just a fact of life.
Art, which is in the business of questioning facts, takes
manipulation as a subject of investigation. And certain contemporary
photographers do so by diving deep into the archive to explore its
mechanics and to carve their own clarifying archives from it.
“Archive Fever” puts us deep inside right from the start. The
gallery walls have been covered with sheets of plain industrial
plywood. The exhibition space looks like the interior of a storage
shed or a shipping container packed with images both strange and
familiar.
Familiar comes first: Andy Warhol’s early 1960s “Race Riot,”
a silk-screened image of a black civil rights marcher attacked by
police dogs. Warhol, our pop Proust, was a child of the archive; he
lived in it and never left it. He culled his images straight from the
public record — in this case Life magazine — and then made them
public in a new way, as a new kind of art, the tabloid masterpiece,
the cheesy sublime.
In the process he messed up our habit of sweetening truth with
beauty, of twisting the base and the awful into the transcendent. He
nailed art’s moral ambivalence, pegged it as a guilty party and kept
hammering away at this. People who hate the 1960s for the illusions
they shattered usually hate Warhol too. He was a slippery spoiler.
The second, far less well-known work that opens the show is a 1987
silk-screen piece by Robert Morris that does what the Warhol does but
in a deadlier way. It too is based on an archival image, a 1945
photograph of the corpse of a woman taken in the Bergen-Belsen
concentration camp. Although such pictures initially circulated in the
popular press, they were soon set aside in an ethically fraught image
bank of 20th-century horrors. As if acknowledging prohibitions, Mr.
Morris has half-obscured the woman’s figure with old-masterish
strokes of paint and encased it, like a relic, in a thick black frame
swelling with body parts and weapons in relief.
The series of war-related paintings this piece came from took a lot
of critical heat in the 1980s. Mr. Morris was accused of, at best,
pandering to a market for neo-Expressionism; at worst, of exploiting
the Holocaust. Now that his reputation as an influential artist of
probing diversity is becoming more clear, so is the impulse behind
this work. When you are looking at great art in museums, it seems to
say, you are, whether you know it or not, looking at realities like
the one you see here. Art is not merely a universal ornament of
civilization. It is a cautionary tale in need of constant translation.
There are many tales in “Archive Fever.” In most, fact and
fiction are confused. A group of pictures called “The Fae Richards
Photo Archive” (1993-1996), produced by Zoe Leonard in collaboration
with the filmmaker Cheryl Dunye, purports to document the life of an
African-American actress from her childhood early in the 20th century
through her post-civil rights era old age. The substance of the
narrative, including a film career sabotaged by racism, rings true;
but Fae Richards never existed. Her life was staged for the
contemporary camera.
So, in a different way, was the saga suggested in
“The Sher-Gil Archive” (1995-97) by Vivan Sundaram, an artist
in New Delhi. In this case the people are real, members of Mr.
Sundaram’s family as photographed by his great grandfather in
colonial India. But Mr. Sundaram has altered the pictures, mixing
eras and generations, meticulously splicing an imaginary whole
from real archival parts.
Other artists present randomness as the archive’s logic. The
casual snapshots that make up Tacita Dean’s salon-style “Floh”
may look like a natural grouping. In fact they are all found pictures
that the artist, acting as a curator, has sorted into a semblance of
unity.
The thousands of images in a looping 36-hour slide projection by
Jef Geys would seem to be linked by a firmer thread. They are a visual
archive of Mr. Geys’s photographic output of 40 years. Whether they
provide evidence of aesthetic development, though, or insight into the
artist’s maturing mind and soul, will be known only to the most
devoted of viewers.
In any case, the romantic notion that an artist’s work and soul
are inevitably of a piece has long been poked at and played with by
artists themselves. Sherrie Levine’s photographs of Walker Evans
photographs debunk the heroic ideals of personal vision in art. At the
same time, because the copies are genuine Sherrie Levines, the ideal
is reaffirmed; and another name enters the market, the museums, the
history books.
Just as Ms. Levine questions authenticity as a component of art
making, some of her contemporaries question its role in writing
history. In a video called “The Specialist: Eichmann in Jerusalem”
(1999), the Israeli artist Eyal Sivan reordered scenes in videos of
the 1961 trial of the Nazi war criminal Adolph Eichmann to create new
sequences and, some have said, a less damning portrait of him. In
elaborate conceptual projects the artist Walid Raad revisits the
Lebanese civil war of the 1980s in minute, graphic detail, through the
voices of people who never existed using details he has invented.
For some artists details, or rather the accumulation of them, are
the only truth. On large sheets of paper, Felix Gonzalez-Torres
(1957-1996) printed photographic portraits of almost 500 people killed
by gunfire in American cities in a single week in 1989. Ilán
Lieberman’s “Lost Child” series consists of a stream of
hand-drawn thumbnail portraits, based on photographs in Mexican
newspapers, of missing children.
And in the show’s most startling example of archival
accumulation, the German artist Hans-Peter Feldmann has filled a room
with the framed front pages of 100 international newspapers — from
Paris, Dubai, Sydney, Seoul, New York and elsewhere — printed on
Sept. 12, 2001. Questions flood in: Why were certain pictures of the
devastated Twin Towers used in certain places? Why does Osama bin
Laden’s face appear on some pages and not on others? And how is the
story reported in languages we cannot read; Arabic, say, or Persian?
And what could readers who didn’t read English know of our reports?
To enter this archive is to relive recent history. I was reluctant to
go in, but then I couldn’t leave.
Mr. Feldmann’s work, made for this exhibition, is monumental.
Fazal Sheikh’s “Victor Weeps: Afghanistan” series (1997) is, in
almost every way, not. Each of the four pictures in the show is of a
hand holding a passport-size photographic male portrait. Statements by
the family members who hold the photos tell us that they are portraits
of Afghan mujahedeen fighters who had died or disappeared during
battles with occupying Russian forces in the 1980s.
Although the portraits are in each case held loosely, even
tenderly, the words they evoke are passionate. These little pictures
— routine, unexceptional, of a kind turned out in countless numbers
— may be the only visual link between the dead and their survivors.
Here the archival is profoundly personal.
But do Mr. Sheikh’s beautiful pictures, or the photographs within
them, represent some special, easily approached corner of the great
archive that surrounds, shapes and even overwhelms us? Do they convey
, for once, some comprehendible truth? No, just the ordinary one: When
it comes to full disclosure, art never, ever speaks for itself, as Mr.
Enwezor’s eloquent exhibition tells us in many ways.
January 18, 2008
|